<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter me timbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.brianhartsock.com/2008/12/03/twitter-me-timbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.brianhartsock.com/2008/12/03/twitter-me-timbers/</link>
	<description>The exciting life of a software developer and nerd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia Baute</title>
		<link>http://blog.brianhartsock.com/2008/12/03/twitter-me-timbers/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia Baute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brianhartsock.com/?p=196#comment-535</guid>
		<description>The thing that differentiates Twitter for me is it lets me feel as if I can get to know a bit more about people, because Twitter IS so casual, such a snapshot of a moment of time.  You can throw out emotions, situations, what you are thinking about at that exact moment.  It lacks the formality of a blog, the perception of a requirement for some deep commitment to what you are saying, and the potential self editing that naturally occurs in those situations.  Similar to the concept of the page a day advocated in the Artist&#039;s Way... I think limiting text to a one- or two-liner fosters an environment where people feel they are allowed to be raw and unedited because it&#039;s not a commitment.

For people who use it for strictly business it&#039;s actually a bit of a snore for me, because if I want your thoughts on business I&#039;ll find your blog - if I&#039;m looking for deep words or information, I&#039;ll make the deeper commitment to look for your site.

So... For me, what I really want from Twitter is to &quot;get to know&quot; (vicariously, maybe, yes) people.  And I believe (for better or worse!) that people who follow me on Twitter get to know me a bit.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that differentiates Twitter for me is it lets me feel as if I can get to know a bit more about people, because Twitter IS so casual, such a snapshot of a moment of time.  You can throw out emotions, situations, what you are thinking about at that exact moment.  It lacks the formality of a blog, the perception of a requirement for some deep commitment to what you are saying, and the potential self editing that naturally occurs in those situations.  Similar to the concept of the page a day advocated in the Artist&#8217;s Way&#8230; I think limiting text to a one- or two-liner fosters an environment where people feel they are allowed to be raw and unedited because it&#8217;s not a commitment.</p>
<p>For people who use it for strictly business it&#8217;s actually a bit of a snore for me, because if I want your thoughts on business I&#8217;ll find your blog &#8211; if I&#8217;m looking for deep words or information, I&#8217;ll make the deeper commitment to look for your site.</p>
<p>So&#8230; For me, what I really want from Twitter is to &#8220;get to know&#8221; (vicariously, maybe, yes) people.  And I believe (for better or worse!) that people who follow me on Twitter get to know me a bit.  <img src='http://blog.brianhartsock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
